WikiQueer:Copying within WikiQueer

WikiQueer's licensing requires that attribution be given to the original author. For most pages, this is supplied by the page history, with exceptions associated with copying and deletion. In these cases, supplementary attribution must be provided by either a link back to the source page, if available, or a list of authors. At minimum, this means a linked edit summary at the destination page—that is, the page into which the material is copied. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. Content reusers should also consider leaving a note at the talk pages of both source and destination.

Why attribution is required
Contributors to WikiQueer are not asked to surrender their copyright to the material they contribute. Instead, they are required to co-license their contributions under the copyleft licenses Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Both of these licenses allow reuse and modification, but reserve the right to attribution. The CC-BY-SA, section 4(c), states that: "You must ... provide ... the name of the Original Author (or pseudonym, if applicable) ... and ... in the case of an Adaptation, a credit identifying the use of the Work in the Adaptation (e.g., 'French translation of the Work by Original Author,' or 'Screenplay based on original Work by Original Author'). The credit required by this Section 4(c) may be implemented in any reasonable manner; provided, however, that in the case of a Adaptation or Collection, at a minimum such credit will appear, if a credit for all contributing authors of the Adaptation or Collection appears, then as part of these credits and in a manner at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors." The GFDL, section 4-I, states that:"... you must ... Preserve the section Entitled 'History', Preserve its Title, and add to it an item stating at least the title, year, new authors, and publisher of the Modified Version as given on the Title Page."

If material is used without attribution, it violates the licensing terms under which it has been provided, which in turn violates the Reusers' rights and obligations clause of WikiQueer's copyrights policy.

Where attribution is not needed
Not everything copied from one WikiQueer page to another requires attribution. If the re-user is the sole contributor of the text at the other page, attribution is not necessary. Content rewritten in one's own words does not need attribution. However, duplicating material by other contributors that is sufficiently creative to be copyrightable under US law (as the governing law for WikiQueer), requires attribution.

As guidance, none of the following are "creative expression" requiring attribution, for WikiQueer purposes:
 * Bare references;
 * Common expressions and idioms;
 * Simple, non-creative lists of information (such as a list of actors in a television program by order of appearance or alphabetical order);
 * Basic mathematical and scientific formulae;
 * Material that will be reverted and deleted in full, with no copy kept on the public wiki. (This particularly covers vandalism, private information, offensive or disruptive comments, gibberish, BLP vios and defamation, etc, that are being deleted or redacted by an administrator.)

Quotes from external sources do not need to be attributed to the original WikiQueer contributor, although any text surrounding them would be, and the original source must still be cited. However, even though attribution is not required in these cases, including a link is often useful.

Proper attribution
Attribution can be provided in any of the fashions detailed in the Terms of Use (listed above), although methods (a) and (c) — i.e., through a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the article or articles you contributed to; or through a list of all authors — are the most practical for transferring text from one WikiQueer page to another. Both methods have strengths and weaknesses, but either satisfies the licensing requirements if properly done.
 * Hyperlink: If material has been contributed by more than one author, providing a link in the edit summary is the simplest method of providing attribution. A statement in the edit summary such as  will direct interested parties to the edit history of the source page, where they can trace exactly who added what content when. A disadvantage with this method is that the page history of the original article must subsequently be retained in order to maintain attribution. To avoid the source page being inadvertently moved or deleted, it is helpful to make a note of the copying on the talk page of the source article. The template copied can be used for this purpose. This template can also be added to the destination talk page.
 * List of authors: When dealing with a page edited by many, a hyperlink is the simplest solution, but if the content being copied has only one contributor, it may be preferable simply to list him or her individually. Using this method, the edit history of the source page is unnecessary, and it will not matter if the source page is later deleted or moved. A statement in the edit summary such as  serves as full attribution. If the material being copied has more than one author, attribution requirements can technically be satisfied with a note in edit summary directing attention to a list of contributors on the talk page, but as the Terms of Service indicate, a hyperlink is preferred where possible.

Merging and splitting
While there may be many reasons to duplicate text from one page into another, there are additional procedures, and templates, which may be necessary for certain situations of copying within WikiQueer. For merging two articles together or content from one article into another, see WikiQueer:Merging. For splitting one article into two or more, see WikiQueer:Splitting.

Content forking
There are also some situations in WikiQueer where copying may not be appropriate, such as if two articles are being created on the same subject because editors of the original cannot agree on the article's development. This is called "content forking". The acceptable solution to disagreement on the development of an article is to seek consensus through dispute resolution.

Reusing deleted material
If an article is deleted, its history is removed and thus its content cannot be reused on WikiQueer—even under the same article title—unless attribution is otherwise provided (or the page undeleted). Deleted articles may not be recovered and reused from Google cache, or the view-deleted administrator right.

It may sometimes be necessary to delete specific parts of an article's history for various reasons (copyright violations introduced but later excised; extreme personal attacks; personal information) through Selective History deletion, Revision Deletion or Oversight. If the article retains contributions placed by users in the deleted / oversighted revisions, those must be attributed. Dummy edits should be used for this purpose, whenever practical; otherwise, talk page attribution will be necessary. A typical dummy edit summary could read, for instance

Userfication
If an article is "userified"—copied or moved into user space—it must be fully attributed. If an article is being moved to userspace to avoid deletion (or to work on after deletion), the full history should be visible (restored if necessary) and then moved using the move button. If a user wishes to copy all or part of an article to work on in userspace, he or she should use an edit summary like.

Repairing insufficient attribution
While technically licensing violations are copyright violations, pages that contain unattributed text do not normally need to be deleted. Attribution can be belatedly supplied by the methods above, using dummy edits to record new edit summaries and via talk page attribution using the copied template. Such belated attribution should make clear when the relevant text entered the page. You can also identify problem articles, in particular complex cases that you cannot fix right away, by tagging the article itself with the templates CWW (for a single origin) and CWW-multi (for articles with multiple origins).

When possible, the re-user should be notified of the proper procedures for copying text between pages. The template uw-c&pmove is available for addressing cut-and-paste moves. For other copying situations, the uw-copying template can be used.

Repairing cut and paste moves of a page
If the entire contents of one page were relocated to another title via cutting and pasting, leaving a redirect at the previous page, the licensing violation can be repaired through the use of the histmerge template. If the situation is more complex—as for example if a new article has developed at the source page on a subject with related title—the situation should be addressed at the cut and paste move repair holding pen for administrator attention.